A learner, a fixed PID, and an adaptive controller (MRAC) share the same plant. Flip the steering polarity. The tuned laws can’t cross zero. The learner re-adapts.
The page is a view. The learner stays on the host; you send flip / scramble and get plant state back.
Three cars, one job: stay centered. The physics are identical for all three; the only difference is what does the steering.
The learner starts blank. No pre-training, no labels, no teacher. It steers, watches what its own steering actually did to the car, and learns from the gap between what it expected and what happened. That gap is the learning signal: the world grading it.
The percentage on each lane is time spent on-track. The chart on the right is distance from center over time; lower is better.
Recovery after the flip is real but not instant, and the car wobbles while it re-learns. Bounded does not mean safe in the transient; it means the learner cannot run away while it works. PID is better than the learner on the nominal road. The claim is not that it outdrives a tuned controller, but that it survives a change the tuned controller structurally cannot cross.
A fixed control law is correct until the world stops matching the assumptions it was written under. Here the assumption breaks in the most basic way possible, and the only thing still on the road is the one that was never told the answer in the first place.